Motto: „You can avoid the outcomes of human justice, but you cannot avoid justice meted out by God – so brace yourself that the (totaliztic) karma that you have accumulated WILL BE fulfilled.”
The very concept of „karma” comes from Hinduism. Unfortunately Hinduism is NOT relying, nor uses, the scientific approach based on evidence, on quantifying and on defining – which are so strictly followed by the philosophy of totalizm and by the new totaliztic science. In addition, Hindu karma supposedly has to be returned in further reincarnations, NOT still in our present physical life, while to the returning back supposed to be subjected in it the exactly the same interactions between the exactly the same persons, NOT just consequences of the mutual interactions of these people (e.g. NOT feelings caused by human interactions like is the case in the returning of totaliztic karma described here). Thus, for example, in the Hindu beliefs, if in this life one borrows money from someone, but these money are NOT given back, then the Hindu karma is to cause that in the next life one is forced into the action of giving them back to exactly the same person. (For comparison, in the definition of „totaliztic karma” described here, if one borrows from someone else money and does NOT give them back, then after the elapse of „time of return”, although still during the same physical life, one suffers some kind of loss, typically caused by a completely different person, which loss is to cause that one experiences exactly the same consequences as consequences previously experienced by the lender of money, e.g. the same feelings – although this loss does NOT need to be resulting from activities of lending money to someone.) In turn this lack of scientific approach and definition, in conjunction with the supposed return of Hindu karma only during next reincarnations, causes that the Hindu karma does NOT allow neither to scientifically detect and investigate its manifestations and way it works, nor to scientifically accumulate empirical evidence which confirms the actual existence of it and allows to decode algorithms of its actions – such as the evidence presented in item #F1 from the web page named „karma.htm” (addresses of which are provided at the end of this post). Therefore Hindu karma remains in the realm of faith, while everything that was investigated and is used by the philosophy of totalizm and by the new totaliztic science, including the totaliztic karma (and also the totaliztic nirvana), already belongs to the sphere of knowledge that previously was confirmed on various empirical evidence. So as below it will be explained here in conjunction with item #E1 of the web page named „karma.htm”, as well as it is mentioned in the introduction and in item #A5 of the web page named „karma.htm”, the „philosophy of totalizm” and equally strict the new „totaliztic science”, define here the based on evidence concept of „totaliztic karma” in a significantly different way than the term „Hindu karma” is described at present on the basis of centuries-long passing from mouth to mouth in the Hindu spoken traditions.
But before I present here the definition of „totaliztic karma” developed by the new „totaliztic science”, I should first explain the terminology that we use to formulate this definition (preferably discussing for this purpose some simplified life example from the group of examples that are relatively typical for our times, e.g. of a teenager stealing a car from his neighbour), as well as to explain the general work of moral mechanisms, which later enforce the fulfilment of karma (e.g. on an example of action of the „moral field” described in items #C4.2.1 and #C4.2 from my another web page named „morals.htm”). After all, without explaining this terminology and the work, the reader is unable to really understand the definition of „totaliztic karma”. So let us assume that we analyze the morally simplified case from real life, when a teenager just stole a car from his neighbour. This is because such a case represents a standard moral situation, when two intellects, i.e. in this case a „teenager” and a „neighbour”, somehow interact with each other, thereby initiating the generation of karma and the triggering of moral mechanisms (e.g. the moral field). As I already explained this in item #B3 from the web page named „pajak_re_2017.htm” and in item #C4.2 from the web page named „morals.htm”, the work of moral mechanisms always is carried out in two mutually opposite phases, namely in the short-term phase (i.e. the one which takes place mainly during the time when the intellects still interact with each other), and in the long-term phase (i.e. the one that eventuates only several years later after the so-called „time of return” elapses). In the short-term phase moral mechanisms work as if they encouraged and helped to carry out the immoral acting of people while disturbed and harmed the morally-correct acting of people – as I explained this in detail e.g. in item #B3 from my web page „pajak_re_2017.htm”, or in item #F5 from my web page named „pajak_for_mp_2014.htm”, while I illustrated it on examples taken from real life in items #A2, 7 from #F3, #N1, and #T7 of my web page named „solar.htm”. However, in the long-term phase moral mechanisms work in opposite, i.e. they decisively reward morally correct behaviours while punish immorality – as I explained this e.g. in item #A1.1, and in (3) from item #H2 of my web page named „totalizm.htm”. So in the case of car theft discussed here, which is an immoral acting, in the short-term (i.e. „judgmental”) phase, the teenager accomplishes various „mock effects” of his action, that look as if they were „beneficial” for him, because they bring him various supposed (mock) benefits in all three dimensions of moral space illustrated by vectors in „Fig. #I1” from my web page named „pajak_for_mp_2014.htm”. For example, in the „intellectual (X)” dimension this teenager is gaining a recognition and attention of his buddies, in the „emotional (Y)” dimension he is gaining satisfaction with the success of his theft, while in the „physical (Z)” dimension he is raking into his possession the neighbour car which allows him to ride instead of walking. (Notice here that in real life these consequences in each of these three dimensions are much more complicated. But in order to not unnecessarily complicate this example, everything I explain here very simply.) Meanwhile, with the neighbour, from whom this teenager stole the car, the situation is different. Since stealing is an immoral action, as the outcome of it the neighbour suffers losses in all these three dimensions. For example, in the „intellectual (X)” dimension the neighbour receives the bitter lesson that in the future he should heed the old Polish proverb „do today what you want to do tomorrow, leave for tomorrow what you want to eat today” and should install an alarm in his car – like his wife has long admonished him and grumbled about this matter. In the „emotional (Y)” dimension he is going through a grief and a feeling of injustice caused by the loss of the car. In turn in the „physical (Z)” dimension he must begin to walk everywhere on foot, instead of (as previously) to drive his car. Because of these losses, the mind of that neighbour sends the unwanted program of „karma” to the mind of the teenager – which the neighbour suspects of stealing. Unfortunately, despite of reporting the theft to police, the teenager is NOT accused of stealing, because he, for example, set fire to the car before the police managed to recover it and see whose fingerprints appear in it. So the time is passing. The teenager grows up into a criminal adult and maybe even he forgets about that theft. However, after around 7 to 10 years the „time of return” elapses and the moral mechanisms are kick-starting the return of that karma which was previously accumulated by the teenager. So the long-term (i.e. „rewarding” or „punishing”) phase of the moral mechanisms work is triggered. In this phase, during a subsequent theft, a former teenager e.g. slips his legs and he is caught „red-handed”. He gets a sentence and lands in a jail. The prison reality this time causes that he begins to feel everything that felt his neighbour which passed to him the karma for stealing the car. I mean, in the „intellectual (X)” dimension the former teenager receives a bitter lesson that the acting incompatible with what the Bible, tradition and other people require from us (e.g. the committing of theft) does NOT pay and always ends up miserably. In the „emotional (Y)” dimension he is going through a grief and a sense of injustice, because of the treatment he receives from other inmates. In turn in the „physical (Z)” dimension he must carry out an unwanted walking job, because of the educational program in his prison just uses forced labour as a tool of rehabilitation. In other words, although these are already different people and other actions that execute the fulfilment of karma in the former teenager, still after the „time of return” elapses that teenager is going through exactly the same consequences from the return of previously received karma, including the experiencing of the same feelings of the same power, as the consequences that his own action previously caused in the neighbour – i.e. in the person who originally generated that unwanted karma that was passed to him these 7 to 10 years earlier.
To the above example I should also add a few comments. For example, that although for simplifying my explanations this example concerned an immoral action, still in actions that are morally-correct the moral mechanisms work likewise – only that all their consequences are then opposite to those described above. In addition, I should also add here that from the point of view of „karma”, in the three-dimensional moral space the most important and the dominating other dimension, are „feelings (Y)”. This is because mainly due to analyzing the type of experienced feelings and their power, one can empirically link the activity that generated a given karma, with the return of that karma. Therefore, although karma is just a single component out of a whole range of moral mechanisms, in analyzes of only karma one can skip axes „intellectual (X)” and „physical (Z)” and limit the consideration to „feelings (Y)” only. (Notice that outside of this post, i.e. outside of the post which defines also the „time of return”, and thus which explanations refer to virtually every component of moral mechanisms, including the „moral field”, I do such limiting of my consideration to only axis of „feelings (X)” both in the rest of this post and the web page named „karma.htm”, as well as on other web pages that specifically refer to karma.) However, e.g. in cases of analyzing the work of „moral field” (described in items #C4.2 and #C4.2.1 from the web page „morals.htm”) the omission of considering the „intellectual (X)” axis and the „physical (Z)” axis becomes almost impossible, because for the „moral field” consequences of human activities in these two axes often dominate over the axis of „feelings (Y)”. Therefore, in analysis of „moral field”, or any other than karma components of moral mechanisms, one always needs to take into account all the consequences that they generate for people affected by them.
On the basis of the terminology and work of moral mechanisms illustrated and explained with the above example, the definition of totaliztic „karma” developed by the new „totaliztic science” can be expressed e.g. with the following words: „karma” is the self-implementing natural program that triggers experiencing strictly defined consequences of the intellectual (X), emotional (Y) and physical (Z) nature, which program is generated and sent by the intellect just experiencing these consequences, while is received and stored by the intellect which originally caused the experiencing of these consequences by the intellect generating this karma and thus which intellect receiving karma then becomes a carrier of that karma – wherein after the elapse of so-called „time of return” (i.e. the many years long delay in the implementation of karma) this program of karma is to cause, that its new carrier still in the duration of his/her current physical life inevitably re-lives the feedback experiences with the same consequences of intellectual (X), emotional (Y) and physical (Z) nature, which previously he/she caused in the original intellect that generated and passed to him/her this particular karma.
In item #A1 of the web page named „karma.htm” I have explained what is the content of that natural program of totaliztic „karma”. For example, the recording of feelings included into it can be considered as an emotional analogy to today’s digital images sent to someone with the help of the Internet, and typically stored in a computer file with e.g. the name ending „jpg”. This is because similarly as such „jpg” computer file allows to transfer the colour images from one person to another, also the natural programs of totaliztic karma automatically send the „image” of feeling that we just experience, to the person (i.e. to the so-called „intellect”) about which we believe that this person caused for us the experiencing of that particular feeling. In a similar way to the passing of content of emotional axis (Y), the program of karma passes also the contents of the other two axes (X) and (Z).
The above definition of totaliztic karma reveals also to us, that the intellect which generates a program of specific karma, has already experienced precisely the same kind of consequences (including feelings) that are embedded into given program of karma. So unconsciously the picture of these consequences (including feelings) stored in the natural program of karma, is send to the intellect, that according to the knowledge of the sending intellect is responsible for the occurrence of these consequences (including the feeling), so that also the karma receiving intellect irrevocably re-lives these consequences at a later date, i.e. after the elapse of the „time of return”. (What is an „intellect”, it is summarized in item #B7 on the web page named „karma.htm”, while is explained in more detail in item #E2 from the web page named „totalizm.htm”.)
An interesting aspect of the irrevocability of experiencing the entire received karma still during the present physical life is that if someone is just dying, but he/she still has a lot of unwanted karma for experiencing, then his/her last days and moments are starting to be very „dramatic” – thus enabling the fulfilment of the rest of the still unfulfilled karma. In turn people that are dying but with the unfulfilled surplus of wanted karma, spend their last days and moments as that karma defines this spending for them.
The philosophy of totalizm explains also that there are two kinds of intellects, namely (a) individual intellects, means single people, and (b) group intellects, means entire countries, nations, cities, factories, organizations, institutions, families, etc. – for details see item #E2 on the web page „totalizm.htm”. Also each type of intellects conducts its own independent life, is exposed to work of moral mechanisms, affects other intellects inducing in them certain consequences (including feelings), and receives karma from these other intellects. Because of this receiving of karma from other intellects by both these types of intellects, there are as many as four cases of karma transmission. Since these cases typically have different „times of return” and different amounts of energy contained in the transmitted karma (i.e. different power of karma), in deliberations of such cases they must be mutually distinguished. And so, karma may be transferred: (i) from an individual intellect to another individual intellect (i.e. from a person to a person), (ii) from an individual intellect to a group intellect (e.g. from a person to an institution), (iii) from a group intellect to another group intellect (e.g. from a nation to another nation), and (iv) from a group intellect to an individual intellect (e.g. from a nation to a politician). What is the most important, my research to-date seems to document, that in the karma passed by the group intellects are added together (i.e. are cumulating) all the consequences (including feelings) of given type, which in this group intellect experienced all its individual participants. This in turn causes that the power of the transmitted group karma is overwhelmingly large and incomparably greater than the power of karma passed by the individual people – which fact introduces particularly dangerous consequences in all cases of transfers of (iv) type, i.e. from a group intellect to an individual intellect. For example, just such a transfer (iv) of overwhelming bad group karma often takes place in case of corrupted individual politicians, described in items #E3 and #E4 from the web page „pajak_for_mp_2017.htm”. So we should NOT be surprised that these corrupt politicians often receive a group karma of so immense power, that they highly dramatically die immediately after the elapse of the „time of return” for this karma. We also should not be surprised that politicians disliked by a lot of people from the group intellect ruled by them, very quickly start to look like grimaces on faces of these people, who send karma to them (i.e. old, bitter, unhappy, etc.).
The above should be complemented with the information, that at the present level of research it is difficult to locate the habitat of karma (i.e. a place of storing of „images” for the consequences of received totaliztic karma) and the habitat of moral mechanism which causes the return of these consequences (e.g. the return of feelings) described by a given karma. However, the to-date research of the human soul described on the web page named „soul_proof.htm” suggest that the most likely karma is stored just in the system of natural programs that make up our soul, or more precisely by the system of software that links a given soul with the souls of other intellects. On the other hand, the implementation of the karma is probably carried out by the non-connected with the soul, external moral mechanisms that form, amongst others, the „moral field”.
The concept, which in the discussed here definition of „totaliztic karma” is particularly important, is the so-called „time of return”. This „time of return” is the amount of time that elapses between the action of some intellect, and the moment when moral mechanisms initiate the long-term events with which the original consequences of this action will be returned to this intellect. In other words, the „time of return” is the time after which the moral mechanisms initiate and implement relevant secondary events that „pay out” (or „correct” or „pay back” or „reward”) consequences of the original action of given intellect – i.e. the actions that in another intellect caused certain consequences (e.g. feelings) and thus resulted in the receiving of karma from that other intellect (which karma after this „time of return” will cause that this other intellect is to experience various events or activities that also in it are to induce the experiencing of the same consequences returned to him/her by the karma – e.g. the same feelings). Due to the huge importance of this „time of return” for the work of all moral mechanisms (i.e. NOT only for the work of „karma” described here, but also for the work of e.g. the „moral field”), irrespective of this post, the time of return is also explained on several other totaliztic web pages, for example, in items #C4.2 and #C4.2.2 from my web page named „morals.htm”.
As for the sole fact of returning the totaliztic „karma”, for which a given intellect deserved (and the return of it still during the current life of this intellect), at the present level of research there is NO slightest doubt that this return does occur with a truly computer precision. This is because if someone has eyes and ears open, on an irrevocable approach of the return of karma still in this life of a given intellect he/she is to find an entire ocean of empirical examples and evidence – the most representative examples of which I pointed out and discussed on the web page named „karma.htm”, e.g. in item #F1, as well as here. What remains, however, still unknown exactly, is how much is for each category of human actions that waiting time for the return of karma, means how much is for them that „time of return”. The only thing that I managed to determine so-far is that for typical cases of actions of individual intellects (i.e. for single people and for the case (i) of transferring karma from an individual intellect to another individual intellect) that „time of return” ranges from 7 to 10 years (although for some strongly disapproved by God activities can be even shorter). In turn, for group intellects (and for case (iii) of transferring karma from a group intellect to another group intellect), typically the time of return is about 10 times longer, means typically it is about 70 to 100 years. However, in special cases of actions that God earnestly combats in humans, this „time of return” is significantly reduced (speeded up), thus for activities strongly disapproved by God, e.g. for aggressive wars, the time of return can be shortened to similar length as for individual intellects (e.g. 7 to 10 years, or even less) – for details see items #B2.2 and #B2.3 from the web page named „mozajski_uk.htm”, items #C4.2.2 and #C4.2 from the web page named „morals.htm”, and item #J6 from the web page named „bitwa_o_milicz_uk.htm”.
That shortening (acceleration) of the time of return for some cases of group immoralities, means also that the time of return can be used even as a kind of group „indicator of the moral correctness”. This is because very clearly, the more harmful in God’s eyes is a given kind of group violation of moral criteria, the shorter is the time of return for cases of this violation. On the other hand, these „indicators” are tools that for people practicing the philosophy of totalizm allow to quickly check whether the action that they just intend to take is correct morally, or is immoral, and thus whether the return of karma that these actions are to generate turn out to be pleasant, or rather unpleasant . All „indicators of moral correctness” that are already identified by the new totaliztic science are described in items #C4.2 to #C4.7 from my web page named „morals.htm”. The most important of them include: our conscience, moral field, moral energy, moral laws, karma, and still a few others (including the „time of return”). The use of „time of return” as another such group „indicator of the moral correctness” is explained in item #C4.2.2 from the web page named „morals.htm”. In turn a list of detected so-far by the new „totaliztic science” cases of significant shortening of the „time of return” in cases of group immoralities is listed in items #B2.2 and #B2.3 from my web page named „mozajski.htm”.
* * *
The above post is an adaptation of item #A4 from my web page (available in the English language) named „karma.htm” (updated on 20th of May 2016, or later). Thus, the reading of the above descriptions would be even more effective from that web page, than from this post – after all e.g. on the totaliztic web pages are working all (green) links to other related web pages with additional explanations, important texts are highlighted with colours, the content is supported with illustrations, the content is updated regularly, etc. The most recent update of the web page „karma.htm” can be viewed, amongst others, through addresses:
(*) Notice that every address with totaliztic web pages, including all the above web addresses, should contain all totaliztic (my) web pages – including all the web pages indicated in this post. Thus, in order to see any totaliztic (my) web page that interests the reader, it suffices that in one amongst the above addresses, the web page name „karma.htm” is changed into the name of web page which one wishes to see. For example, in order to see the web page named „morals.htm” e.g. from the totaliztic web site with the address http://energia.sl.pl/karma.htm , it is enough that instead of this address in the window of an internet browser one writes e.g. the address http://energia.sl.pl/morals.htm .
It is worth to know as well, that almost each new topic that I am researching on principles of my „scientific hobby” with „a priori” approach of the new „totaliztic science”, including this one, is repeated in all mirror blogs of totalizm still in existence (the above topic is repeated in there as the post number #270E). In past there were 5 such blogs. At the moment only two blogs of totalizm still remain undeleted by adversaries of the new „totaliztic science” and of the moral philosophy of totalizm. These can be viewed at following internet addresses:
With the totaliztic salute,