Motto: „A single formal proof could be overlooked, two proofs could be not believed, three proofs could still be ignored by these most stubborn ones, but four different formal scientific proofs that confirm the same fact of the existence of God must be taken under consideration, while when the fifth and yet further formal scientific proofs also joined them, which again confirm the same truth about the existence of God, and the validity of which could NOT be undermined even by most devoted atheists, then we really need to revise our attitude towards our creator, superior judge, and eventual saviour.”
#G3: If we want that a building effectively resists of destructive winds and actions, it must be built on solid physical foundations. In turn when we want to make lives of ourselves and our descendants to be effectively resisting of misfortunes and historical calamities, then these lives must also be built on solid foundations – but this time the moral, spiritual and scientific ones. In the case of our own lives, such foundations are provided by the scientific certainty of the existence of God, soul, another world, etc. In turn, this scientific certainty is provided by formal proofs for the existence of God, soul, another world, etc. Unfortunately, when I started my life, the official science still ignored the obvious and did NOT even try to develop such kinds of proofs. Thus, throughout my entire life, I was forced to develop and formulate these proofs myself. But now, when we finally have these formal scientific proofs, I am happy to make them readily available to anyone interested – so that I could save other people from laborious and costly searches through which from necessity I went myself. Thus, now anyone can build and base own life on these my formal proofs.
The formal scientific proof for the existence of God presented in above item #G2, is NOT the only formal scientific proof based on methods of mathematical logic, that I developed and published (mainly in 2007), and that reassure us in the certainty of the existence of that superior being by the religions called „God”, while scientifically called the „universal intellect”. (The scientific name „universal intellect” is used by the philosophy of totalizm and by the new „totaliztic science” – i.e. by that new science which is defined in item #C4 from the web page named „telekinetics.htm”.) This is because in that breakthrough for me year of 2007 I developed also and published a number of other theoretical formal proofs related to that one from item #G2 above. All these other related proofs also prove the existence of God either directly or indirectly. Also all of them I developed and published personally for the first time in the world to fix with their help the lack of knowledge in areas that are deliberately ignored by the so-called old official „atheistic orthodox science” (i.e. by this monopolistic science which erroneous findings we still learn in schools and universities, and which various immoral practices (e.g. of gradual eroding of principles of „morality” required from us by God) are exposed e.g. in items #C1 to #C6 from the totaliztic web page named „telekinetics.htm”). Almost all these proofs utilize also the proving procedure presented in item #G2 from the web page named „god_proof.htm” – which is derived from the theoretical methods of mathematical logic. Only a few of them use other proving procedures, for example those ones based on the physical method of „matching attributes” – which proving power, however, is equally indisputable as that one for the theoretical procedure provided above. So let us now describe briefly all these formal scientific proofs which I developed for the first time in the world, and let us also provide links to web pages and publications in which they are available for inspection by interested parties. Here they are:
(1) The formal scientific proof that the „counter-world does exist”. (The name „counter-world” is the scientific name assigned to a world which is separate from our physical world, in which lives God, and which folklore and also religions call the „other world”. Proving its existence refutes the false claims of the old official „atheistic orthodox science”, that universe is composed of only one physical world, and thus that everything that exists in it is visible and detectable by existing scientific instruments.) The formal scientific proof for the existence of the counter-world, completed with the use of theoretical methods of mathematical logic, is presented in item #D3 from the separate web page dedicated to the Concept of Dipolar Gravity, and also in subsection H1.1.4 from volume 4 of the newest monograph [1/5].
(2) The formal scientific proof that „God does exist”. It reassures us scientifically in the matter, which actually is the most important for our existence, but in which the humanity is intentionally deluded by the old official „atheistic orthodox science”. After all, in the entire universe there is NOTHING more saturated with consequences for the people, than the existence of the almighty God who created us and who controls, monitors and judges practically every event from our lives. Independently from item #G2 of the web page named „god_proof.htm” (addresses of which are provided near the end of this post), the formal scientific proof for the existence of God, completed with the theoretical method of mathematical logic, is also presented and discussed in item #B3 from the web page named „god.htm” – about the secular and scientific understanding of God. In addition, the same proof is completed and discussed in subsection I3.3.4 from volume 5 of my newest monograph [1/5].
The power of this formal scientific proof for the existence of God has been further strengthen by the completion of similar proofs for the existence of God with several different proving methods and with the use of a whole range of mutually different bodies of evidence. Some of these proofs (stating that „God exists”), carried out with different proving methods, are presented in subsections I3.3 to I3.3.3 from volume 5 of my newest monograph [1/5]. However, in fact each of the formal proofs listed in this post also represents a direct or an indirect proof for the existence of God. For example, the proof that „the humanity lives in the world created and wisely ruled by almighty God” discussed in (4) below but originally presented in item #B3 (and items #B1 to #B5) from the totaliztic web page named „changelings.htm”, also provides a simultaneous proof for the existence of God. After all, if God did NOT exist, then the humanity could NOT live in the world created and wisely ruled by such a non-existing God.
(3) The formal scientific proof that it was „God that created the first couple of people”. This formal scientific proof corrects the claim of the old „atheistic orthodox science”, about a random occurrence of an event, which, in the light of the theory of probability, actually would be impossible for a random occurring. Namely, it corrects the claim, that from a monkey randomly mutated on the Earth at the same time as many as two new human beings, that is a man and a woman – so that their later sexual intercourses allowed to create a completely new human race. The formal scientific proof that the first couple of people was created by God, carried out with the use of methods of mathematical logic, is presented in item #B8 from the separate web page named „evolution.htm” – dedicated to the discussion of evolution, as well as in subsection NF9 from volume 12 of my newest monograph [1/5] or in subsection I1.4.1 from volume 5 of my monograph [8/2].
(4) The formal scientific proof that „the humanity lives in the world created and wisely ruled by omnipotent God”. This proof straightens old ignorant beliefs of the official „atheistic orthodox science” that the world without God and the world with God would look identically. However, as the new „totaliztic science” informs us about this in item #B1 from the web page named „changelings_pl.htm”, a world without God would differ drastically from the world created and wisely governed by a highly intelligent God. For example, in a world without God, the fate of the people would be ruled by the Darwinian principle of the „survival of the fittest”, while in the world wisely ruled by the almighty God, the fate of the people is discretely subject to the principle of the „extinction of most immoral” described in item #G1 from the web page named „will.htm”. The formal proof that „the humanity lives in the world created and wisely ruled by almighty God” is presented in item #B3 from the web page named „changelings.htm”.
(5) The formal scientific proof that „people have eternal souls”. This proof assures us scientifically in the matter about which there is NO claims of the official science. In addition, it allows that in item #C6 of the web page named „soul_proof.htm” is reinforced the finding of the new „totaliztic science” that „the soul enters the body at the time of breaking the umbilical cord” (i.e. NOT at the time of conception – as it is argued by mindless „arsonists of abortion clinics”). The formal scientific proof stating that „people have immortal souls” is presented in item #G2 from the web page named „soul_proof.htm”, in item #C1.1 of the web page named „nirvana.htm”, and also in subsection I5.2.1 from volume 5 of my newest monograph [1/5].
(6) The formal scientific proof that „God authorised the Bible”. It confirms scientifically what the Bible itself says, namely, that no matter to whom the official „atheistic orthodox science” tries to attribute the authorship of the Bible, the actual author of it (and also the author of other „holy books”) is God Himself. This proof is presented in item #B1 from the web page named „bible.htm” – about mysteries of the Bible authorised by God Himself, and also in subsection M7.1 from volume 11 of my newest monograph [1/5].
The evidential value of this formal scientific proof that „God authorized the Bible”, was further augmented by the completion of the same proof with a completely different method of „matching attributes”. Its completion with this different proving method is discussed in item #B2 of the abovementioned web page named „bible.htm”.
(7) The formal scientific proof that „DNA are most simple forms of natural computers which control the passage through time of cells in which these DNA reside, while this control of the passage of cells through time DNA accomplish by a sequential running of software ‚programs of life and fate’ contained in memories of these DNA”. This proof shows to us, among others, how people can repeatedly go back in time to years of their youth, and thus can gain access to immortal life. It is presented in item #D7 from the web page named „immortality.htm” – about time, time vehicles and access of people to immortality, as well as in subsection M1.6 from volume 11 of my newest monograph marked [1/5].
(8) The formal scientific proof that „UFO vehicles do exist objectively and they are already operational Magnocrafts”. People typically do not see the connection between God and UFOs (and refuse to even consider the fact of existence of such a relationship). However, this relationship follows directly from two immensely important discoveries of the new „totaliztic science”, namely from the discovery (1) that „the main goal for the accomplishment of which God created people is the ‚pursue of knowledge’ „, and from the discovery (2) that „God deliberately ‚simulates’ on the Earth a whole array of phenomena and objects, including UFOs, to inspire in people such pursue of knowledge and searches for truths”. Both these discoveries were made in 2007 due to the use of a different „a priori” approach to research, introduced to the scientific use only by the new so-called „totaliztic science” – that is by this new science which is described more comprehensively in items #C1 to #C6 from the web page named „telekinetics.htm”. The immensely vital discovery (1) of the new „totaliztic science”, that „the major goal for the accomplishment of which God created people is the ‚pursue of knowledge’ „, is described more comprehensively, amongst others, in subsections A3.2 from volume 1 and in subsection NF5 from volume 12 of my newest monograph [1/5], as well as in a number of totaliztic web pages – for example see items #B1 to #B3 from the web page named „antichrist.htm”. In turn the vital discovery (2) of the new „totaliztic science”, that „God deliberately ‚simulates’ UFO vehicles”, and also that God „simulates” a whole array of different phenomena and objects which inspire in people creative searches (e.g. God „simulates” also bones of dinosaurs), is described, amongst others, in #105 from subsection W4 in volume 18 of my newest monograph [1/5], as well as in a number of totaliztic web pages – for example see items #K1 and #L1 to #L4 from the web page named „day26.htm”. Both these discoveries have this to themselves, that philosophically they justify the need for a realistic „simulation” by God of all these physical phenomena and objects that create an illusion which inspire research because it bothers people that the knowledge which originates from God and is given to people in holy books (e.g. in the Bible) is supposedly contradictive to the knowledge resulting from scientific research of the reality that surrounds us. In other words, these discoveries justify e.g. the need for God to „simulate” UFO vehicles, UFOnauts, „bones of dinosaurs”, various monsters of the kind of one from the Loch Ness in Scotland, geological layers which suggest multi-million age of the Earth, etc., etc. In turn, the formal proving that UFO vehicles do exist objectively, is simultaneously one amongst indirect proofs that God does exist, and thus that in the universe does exist a superior and mighty being which has its own superior goals (of the pursue of knowledge kind) for the accomplishment of which this superior being created the humanity. (After all, if God does NOT exist, He would not be able to „simulate” so skilfully and realistically the existence of UFOs, that the whole army of well-paid scientists for many centuries remained helpless and ignorant in all matters regarding these UFOs.) A brief summary of the proof that „UFO vehicles do exist objectively and they are already completed Magnocrafts” was published on the web page named „ufo_proof.htm”. In turn the full version of this proof is published in subsections P2 to P2.17 from volume 14 of my newest monograph [1/5] (disseminated free of charge via every totaliztic web page, amongst others also via the pages addresses of which are provided below). The formal scientific proof, that „UFOs do exist objectively and they are already completed Magnocraft”, was historically the first formal scientific proof developed by the author of this post, which uses the highly reliable proving method called the method of „matching attributes” (which method has a physical nature and is based on empirical evidence). This method was later used several times to complement and reinforce other most important author’s proofs completed theoretically with the method of mathematical logic (i.e. proofs like the one repeated in item #G2 of the web page named „god_proof.htm”).
* * *
The development of all these formal scientific proofs became possible only due to the formulation of the new so-called „totaliztic science” broadly described, amongst others, in items #C1 to #C6 from the web page named „telekinetics.htm”, or in items #F1 to #F3 from the web page named „god_exists.htm”. The reason is that the old so-called „atheistic orthodox science” (i.e. this official science paid from our taxes, which erroneous statements people continue to learn in schools and at universities) abuses its absolute „monopoly for knowledge”, and it refuses to carry out research on these topics which are in any way contrary to the philosophical foundations adopted by it officially, such as: the „Occam’s Razor”, atheism, „a posteriori” approach to research – i.e. the approach „from effects to causes”, etc. (Notice that this old „atheistic orthodox science” completely ignores „a priori” approach to research – i.e. ignores the approach „from cause to effect” means „from God understood as a superior cause of everything, to the world around us as the effect of actions of that God”. This approach „a priori” was implemented in the content of the modern scientific methods only by the new „totaliztic science”, while the above formal scientific proofs represent just one amongst numerous kinds of the results that it already yield. Various other results of the same „a priori” approach to research are summarized in item #B1 from the separate web page named „changelings.htm”.)
It is worth to add here, that all the above formal proofs were fiercely discussed both in Internet as well as in open discussions, and in fact NO-ONE was able to undermine their validity. The existence of such fierce debates is illustrated, amongst others, by the resolution discussed e.g. in item #J2 from the web page named „explain_pl.htm” or in item #D2 from the web page named „timevehicle.htm”. In turn the content of some amongst these public discussions still to this day can be retraced on the online forums linked, amongst others, in item #E2 from the web page named „faq_pl.htm”, or on the blog of totalizm with the address http://totalizm.blox.pl/html/. Such fierce discussions of these profs, which, however, have NOT resulted in undermining the validity of any of them, actually means that all these proofs retain their power until today and for our own good we should consider them in everything that we do.
#G4: In 1957, as a young boy living with pedantically Catholic grandmother, along with a group of my friends who were „altar servers-boys”, I made the effort to also become an „altar server” and to serve for masses in the church from the village named „Cielcza” near Jarocin, Poland. However, in spite of the numerous efforts described in more details in item #G3 from the totaliztic web page named „cielcza_uk.htm”, everything was like „conspiring” so that I do NOT become such an „altar server”. Events which then prevented me from getting the role of an altar server went far beyond what is typically considered to be „random” or „coincidental” events. These events clearly represented deliberate actions of some „superior power” (i.e. God). As a result, instead of becoming then an altar server, a few years later I was turning to be „an atheist”. So when in 1985 during researching the surrounding reality as an „atheistic scientist”, I developed my Concept of Dipolar Gravity – which made me aware of the certainty of the existence of God, I started to wonder „why God did NOT allow me to become an altar server-boy back in 1957?” The answer to this question I found only when I started to analyze the today’s „ideology of Catholicism”, or more specifically, departures of Catholicism (as well as practically all other religions) from vital truths regarding God. As it turns out, to find out the truths regarding God, one cannot have his mind distracted by the ideological baggage imposed onto us by any kind of an ageing religion, but should start the investigations from the very beginning – in the best circumstances, starting from the point of view of an „atheist”. After all, every religion is an institution. In turn, as an institution, every religion is managed by imperfect people. So although every religion has started from the actual truths revealed to people by God (in the case of Catholicism – has started from the truths written down in the Bible), with the passage of time these imperfect people that are managing the institution of a given religion, bring to it increasingly more their own interpretations – and hence also increasingly more errors and distortions. In the result, after some time every religion completely „drowns” the truth about God in the flood of such misinterpretations and distortions introduced to it by imperfect people who manage it and who set the directions in which it keeps changing.
Let us briefly illustrate this on an example. In order people actually „pursue of knowledge” – that is, in order they assisted God in achieving the main goal for which they were originally created and which I explained in (8) above on this post, people must lead a life according to a set of rigid principles which we know today under the name of „morality” – which in more details is explained in items #L1 to #L5 from the web page named „magnocraft.htm”. Unfortunately, in spite that in the somehow „camouflaged” manner (to NOT deprive people of their „free will”), God severely punishes anyone who tries to live „immorally”, and in spite of that among the people already for many centuries operates the principle of „extinction of most immoral” (described in more details in item #G1 from the web page named „will.htm”), people stubbornly refuse to understand, that they have an absolute obligation to lead the moral life. So in order to teach the people the most important truths and the requirements regarding „morality” and the leading of moral life, God in various cultures sent to the Earth His „bodily representations”. These „bodily representations of God” are special beings especially created for this purpose by God, which have bodies that look identical to a human body, but which minds are firmly connected to the mind of God. Hence, they do NOT have a „free will” – such as people do, but they do only what the superior mind of God tells them to do. Their more detailed descriptions are provided on a number of totaliztic web pages – for example in item #D1 of the web page „newzealand_visit.htm”. In the Christian religion, such most important amongst „bodily representations of God” sent to Earth, was named „Jesus”. In order to explain to people in a simple way and with the use of imperfect terminology that was available in biblical times, that Jesus was NOT fully neither God nor man, but just such a „bodily representation of God”, in the Bible for Jesus God uses the closest in meaning name of the „Son of God”. Unfortunately, the imperfect people who later interpreted the scope of meaning of this ambiguous name of the „Son of God”, taking it from a number of different contexts in which the Bible was using it, reinterpreted it later as the name for „God” and practically positioned Jesus in front of true God. Although Christians still recognise „God Father” as being superior towards Jesus, the human stereotypes state that „like father like son” – which proverb expresses also a typical belief that „the appearance and limitations of the father must be similar to the appearance and limitations of the son”. In the result of all this, almost every present strongly believing Christian understands God as a kind of human with the appearance of Jesus. This understanding of God automatically transfers to Him all human limitations. For example, it automatically implies, that God having the human form of Jesus, must have limited opportunities e.g. in seeing of everything that is extremely small with His eyes and mind – e.g. seeing elementary particles, and also in seeing of everything that is very large – for example, the entire galaxies. Therefore, people saturated with the present, already significantly deviated, „Christian ideology”, will have inherited difficulties in understanding, for example, how God manages the intelligent behaviours of such very small elementary particles, while He also governs the fate of the whole stars and galaxies. Also, minds of such strong Christian believers is NOT able to switch then to the understanding of God as the kind of „natural program” which self-evolved and currently resides inside the ever-moving counter-matter, and thus which has a size of the entire visible universe, while simultaneously whose sub-programs reside inside of every elementary particle and thus govern its behaviour – as God is explained by the new „totaliztic science”, amongst others, on the web page named „god.htm”.
This „ideological baggage of Christianity”, which is carried in minds of practically all representatives of the „new wave of Christian creationism”, has a serious impact on the fate of my formal proofs summarized in previous half of this post. As it is apparent from my watching of discussions and presentations, which after the publication of my proofs are conducted by these creationists in internet and on television, although they adopted in their argumentations some of the ideas and a certain evidence from my proofs, they are „ashamed” to recommend to their listeners the need for learning the complete wordings of my proofs and all of my findings. After all, their minds saturated with the Christian ideology, really are NOT willing to accept the entire truth that my research reveals about God. In turn, without the learning and accepting of the entire truth, the knowledge that I try to share with others becomes distorted and does NOT do its work. After all, God is impossible to fully embrace and to fully understand, if one looks at Him from the point of view of human limitations and capabilities. In order to really get to know and comprehend God, one has to put oneself in His situation and look at everything from the perspective of His divine abilities and goals. But such „putting oneself in the situation of God” requires from people two breakthroughs in their views of the world. Firstly (1), it requires that people „started to learn about God from almost a scratch”, means that they „distant their minds from already overgrown with deviations ideology of their own religion” – as on the example of Christian ideology it is already explained above. Secondly (2), it also requires from people to „learn about God from the new philosophical approach called ‚a priori’ „, means that they need to „separate the rules with the aid of which they learn about God from the old philosophical approach ‚a posteriori’ to the exclusive use of which urge them the atheistic methods developed by the old official science”.
The cognitive problems and errors resulting from use of the old atheistic approach „a posteriori” that is imposed on the humanity by the old official science, again it is best to explain and illustrate with an example. In turn, a good example and illustration of these cognitive problems and errors is present situation of the official atheistic science in research of „earthquakes” – i.e. the situation described, amongst others, on the web page named „quake.htm”. Namely, this old „a posteriori” approach orders to research everything from effects to causes. For example, in the case of „earthquakes”, it orders to first analyze and explore „what physical mechanisms cause earthquakes”, and only then it allows an attempt to find methods of predicting and preventing earthquakes that supposedly would result from these mechanisms. Unfortunately, such an approach leads to the situation, that scientists are lost in the vast multitude of details describing „effects”, and in fact are never able to come to finding the actual „causes”. This is why the today official science has NO idea yet how to predict when and where a next earthquake (or any other cataclysm) is to strike, nor it knows a method how these earthquakes can effectively be prevented. However, if a given problem someone researches scientifically from a new „a priori” approach of the new „totaliztic science”, means from the approach „from cause to effects”, or from „God understood as a superior cause to the surrounding reality understood as effects of actions of God”, then for each phenomenon and each object very easily can be discovered its „cause”. For example, the primary „cause” of earthquakes, as well as all other disasters and harms, is the human „immorality” – as this is documented by empirical evidence of items #I3 to #I5 from the web page named „petone.htm”. In turn, knowing the „cause” of earthquakes, it is not difficult to deduce where the next one is to hit, and how to prevent it. After all, the next earthquake (or any other disaster) hits into the community which level of „immorality” has already exceeded the threshold value of being tolerable to God – as this is illustrated, for example, in item #G2 from the web page named „prophecies.htm”. In turn, to prevent an earthquake (or any other cataclysm or harm), it just suffices that a given community changes its behaviours into more „moral” ones – means that they begin to practice the philosophy of totalizm.
Let us briefly clarify now, how the above example explains effects of a widespread use of the old atheistic approach called „a posteriori” by today’s advocates of the „new wave of Christian creationism”. Well, this approach causes, that when attempting to get to know God, starting „from effects of His actions”, today’s proponents of creationism literally „get lost in details” and never are able to get to whatever is the most important about God. I mean, they never are able to get to exploring the superior God’s goals, methods of God’s acting, to finding what God really is and how He evolved in the ever-moving counter-matter, etc., etc. For example, instead of researching, „is it at all possible that more than one omnipotent God could exist in the universe, why the single and only God created a whole number of slightly differing religions, what are the similarities between claims of all these numerous religions, etc.” (as this is explained, amongst others, in item #C6 from the web page named „prawda_uk.htm”), and in the result of this research instead of arriving to conclusions similar to the ones which I published in item #L2 from the web page named „magnocraft.htm”, today’s proponents of creationism are getting lost in details of supposedly different gods that are described by each separate religion, and get stuck in justifications why the claims of Christianity are to be trusted, while statements of all other religions should be ignored as containing untruths. For these reasons, the actual „path to the truth about God”, the adopting of which path the present followers of creationism should finally cease to avoid, is ‚a priori’ approach to research indicated to them by the philosophical and scientific foundations of the new „totaliztic science” – amongst others, with the content of this post.
* * *
The above post is an adaptation of items #G3 and #G4 from the totaliztic web page named „god_proof.htm” (in the English language) – updated on 7 January 2013, or later. Thus, reading of the above descriptions would be even more effective from that web page, than from this post – after all e.g. on the totaliztic web pages are working all (green) links to other related web pages with additional explanations, texts are printed in colours, the content is supported with illustrations, the content is updated regularly, etc. The most recent update of the web page „god_proof.htm” can be viewed, amongst others, at addresses:
Notice that every address with totaliztic web pages, including the above web addresses, should contain all totaliztic web pages – including web pages indicated in this post. Thus, in order to see any totaliztic web page that interests us, it suffices that in one amongst the above addresses the web page name „god_proof.htm” is changed into the name of page which the reader wishes to see. For example, in order to see the web page named „telekinetics.htm” e.g. from the totaliztic web site with the address http://energia.sl.pl/god_proof.htm , it is enough that instead of this address in the window of an internet explorer the reader writes e.g. the address http://energia.sl.pl/telekinetics.htm .
Also notice that a complete list of (and links to) totaliztic topics discussed in various internet forums is provided in item #E2 of the web page named „faq.htm” – also available at every address listed above.
It is worth to know as well, that almost each new topic that I am researching on principles of my „scientific hobby” with „a priori” approach of the new „totaliztic science”, including this one, is repeated in all mirror blogs of totalizm still in existence (the above topic is repeated in there as the post number #228E). In past there were 5 such blogs. At the moment only two blogs of totalizm still remain undeleted by adversaries of the new „totaliztic science” and of the moral philosophy of totalizm. These can be viewed at following internet addresses:
With the totaliztic salute,