#223E: The reason for corruption, inefficiency, errors and distortions of today’s official „science” is a deliberately erroneous definition of the term „science” that this ancient atheistic institution disseminates among the people (in English – po polsku ponizej)

Motto: „Human imperfections are so powerful, that if they are unleashed from control and supervision, then over time they are able to corrupt completely even the most noble institution.”

The most serious problems with today’s official „science” are stemming from the fact, that this science deliberately defines itself in a way that deceives people. For example, the typical definition of „science”, which can be found e.g. in textbooks, dictionaries, and in today’s search engines, says roughly the following: „science is a branch of knowledge or study dealing with a body of facts or truths systematically arranged and showing the operation of general laws”.

Unfortunately, both – the above definition, as well as all other official definitions of the term „science” previously disseminated by the same „science”, demonstrate a high primitiveness, obsolescence, and in addition also errors. As such, they deliberately mislead people – means they actually „lie”. Therefore, the term „science” needs to be redefined (or „reformed”) today in the same way as Karl Marx once redefined („reformed”) the term „capital” – thus opening the eyes of people to the imperfections of the capitalist societies and political systems. Similarly as in past the redefining (or „reforming”) the term „capital” caused revolutions and speed-up the process of improving the lives of many people, let us hope that the today’s redefinition of the term „science” will also improve and simplify access of people to the so-called „truth”. The main shortcomings of the above sample definition, as well as all other official definitions of the term „science” disseminated so-far by the science itself, are as follows:

1. This definition does not reveal that the „orthodox science” to-date really is „an exploiting institution living from taxes of citizens”, which in order to achieve its selfish goals in an easiest way, forces onto the people and now jealously guards, its absolute „monopoly for knowledge and for the formation of human views”. The fact of keeping secret in official definitions, that the science is the „monopolistic institution living from exploitation of taxpayers”, which institution, to gain its monopoly, deliberately and systematically destroyed the other similar institution called „religion”, hides from the sight of taxpayers a whole range of adverse effects arising from this secrecy. For example, it hides from the sight of taxpayers that the science only pretends to „promote progress”, but actually it focuses itself only on the multiplying its own benefits, on caring for its own selfish interests, and on meeting its own needs (instead of meeting the needs of humanity – from taxes of which it is maintained). Furthermore, as a monopolistic institution it actually is NOT interested in ascertaining the truth, in bearing the responsibility for its own claims, nor in correcting its own distortions. Thus, the „truth” it tells only when it is forced to it. It is just for such reasons that nearly everything that the official science claims today, after some time will be announced to be untrue and replaced with some other its lies.

2. This definition does NOT emphasize the fact that the whole „science” and all the „scientists” do NOT generate any physical product, thus regardless of where comes from and how is called the funding for their existence, this funding is always a form of „tax”. In turn by being paid from „taxes” of citizens, this institution really „exploits people”, means it represents an „exploiting institution”. Of course, some readers, especially if they come from the circle of „atheistic orthodox scientists”, are going to argue here, that there exist also scientists who are funded by industry or by various private institutions, e.g. by the private universities. To those, however, persons, I would advise to consider „where come from” and „what consequences cause” such principles of financing of these supposedly „non-tax” sources of livelihoods for some scientists. As it turns out, these sources always have the character of a „tax which is only called with a different name”. For example, the funding of some scientists by the industry causes that products of this industry must be sold on the market at more expensive prices than necessary. Thus, the buyers of these products actually pay kinds of hidden „taxes” which are directed to upkeep of these scientists. The same is true of other „non-tax” scientists, such as those employed in private universities – they also raise the cost, but this time of education, and therefore they also impose onto people an additional kind of „taxes”, only that officially these are NOT called „taxes”.

3. This definition does NOT emphasize the fact that the „science” is built on the philosophical foundations which force it to exist only as an „atheistic institution”. These atheistic scientific foundations of the official science to-date, are described relatively well, amongst others, in items #F1 to #F3 of the totaliztic web page named „god_exists.htm”.

4. This definition does NOT emphasize the fact that the „science” has built permanently into itself such lasting traditions, culture, and rules of conduct, which ensure that for completely false reasons it will never be able to cast-away its „atheism” – no matter what facts and truths come-out in the meantime. Perfect examples of just such traditions, culture and rules of conduct, are traditions and principles of „peer reviews” of research papers by other scientists, and the tradition and the principle of allocation promoters to young scientists writing their masters and doctoral thesis – which both traditions prevent researchers to „go beyond” the generally accepted line, and hence they also prevent any new ideas to get out from under the oppression of this science. This in turn means that the science has permanently embedded into itself such mechanisms that prevent change of its philosophical foundations. This means that the official science is forced by its inner structure and inner mechanisms (i.e. not by outcomes of its research or by the situation in the world around us) to always remain the „atheistic science”.

5. This definition does NOT disclose the fact that there is a whole range of different approaches to research, from the group of which the official science to-date utilises only one approach which by philosophers is called „a posteriori” – means „from effects to the cause”. But this approach allows for the introduction of a variety of errors, distortions, misinterpretations, etc., during „the long road of research” which leads from the „knowledge of the effect” to „determination of the actual cause for this effect”. Therefore, in this science the learning of the truth about the „real causes” for given effects becomes almost impossible. In turn, without knowing the real causes, it is NOT possible to undertake any defence. It is for this reason, that in spite of the existence throughout millennia, the old „atheistic orthodox science” still has not yet managed to work out, and indicate for the use, of even a single effective way of preventing harms or cataclysms, such as ways that by the new „totaliztic science” are documented for example in item #I3 of the web page named „petone.htm”, in item #J1 of the web page named „quake.htm”, or in item #G1 of the web page named „will.htm”.

6. This definition does NOT reveal, that for other approaches to research, such as the approach called „a priori” (means „from the cause to effects”, or „from God understood as the superior cause of everything, to the reality around us which represents an effect of the action of this God”), almost all the phenomena explained by the official science in a way known to us today, receive a completely different explanations – the correctness of which is also confirmed by the existing evidence. This in turn causes, that for the humanity is revealed by the official science only considerably less than half of the „truth” about the universe around us – as this is explained more comprehensively e.g. in item #C2 from web page named „tornado.htm”. Meanwhile, the opposite philosophical approach to that used by the science to-date, called „a priori” approach (means „from cause to effects” or „from God understood as a superior cause of everything, to the surrounding reality understood as effects of the activities of this God”), i.e. the approach used in practice by the new „totaliztic science”, explains every phenomenon and every object in a completely different way than it is done by the official science. To learn some more drastic examples of differences in these explanations, it is enough to learn explanations of the new „totaliztic science” for the process of creation of the physical world – described in subsections A1 to A9 from volume 1 of my newest monograph [1/5], or an explanation of the mechanism of the tornadoes’ formation – described in the totaliztic web page named „tornado.htm”. Best of all, these new persecuted explanations of the new „totaliztic science”, are equally well confirmed by the existing evidence, as the official explanations disseminated by the old official science. As it was discovered only by the new „totaliztic science”, in the world created and governed intelligently by omnipotent God (i.e. in such a world that is described by items #B1 to #B3 from the web page named „changelings.htm”), the origins of every event and every object is confirmed by at least three (3) mutually different (and seemingly contradictory) groups of evidence – this fact is explained in more details in abovementioned item #C2 from the web page named „tornado.htm”.

7. This definition does NOT reveal that in order to maintain its atheism and achieve its selfish goals, the „science” to-date in the intended manner eliminates from its research the exploration of the impact that any events on the Earth have onto the level of so-called „group morality” of people affected by these events. On the other hand, in the „world created and governed intelligently by omnipotent God” (i.e. in the world defined in items #B1 to #B3 from the web page named „changelings.htm”) the „morality” turns out to be the primordial cause of all disasters that affect both individual people and whole communities. At the same time, „morality” is the only factor known to people which can be subject to change and arbitrarily shaped by the people themselves, and thus which allows for communities and individuals to effectively defend themselves against disasters that affect them – i.e. defend from sorts of „natural cataclysms” described e.g. in items #I3 and #I5 from the web page named „petone.htm” or from „premature deaths” described e.g. in items #G1 to #G8 of the web page named „will.htm”. (For the totaliztic definition of „morality” see item #B5 from the web page named „morals.htm”.)

8. Some definitions of the term „science” (in this number also the definition quoted as an example at the beginning of this post) tell us that the „science” supposedly can also be a kind of „abstract” whose existence in the physical world is NOT dependent on the physical existence of an institution that generate products of a given „science”. This their claim is similar to claims that supposedly the „religions” can exist without the existence of a „religious institutions” that have implemented and carried out a given kind of faith and the accompanying rituals. However, any rationally thinking person who knows how many drastically different religions and cults human imperfections already managed to multiply only in a small group of Christian religions, after the analysing of this matter must begin to understand, that neither the „science” nor „religion”, or in fact any other „abstract”, is able to consistently exist if the existence of it is NOT supported and NOT implemented by a physical institution.

Of course, apart from these listed above, there are also further problems and imperfections built into the current official definition of the term „science”. But those other ones are no longer quite as important as those indicated above. An example of these other ones is the fact that virtually all the official definitions of the term „science” disseminated around the world by the old „atheistic orthodox science” actually „disagree” with what ordinary people understand by the name „science”.

With all this in mind, the new „totaliztic science” advocates that the term „science” should be redefined („reformed”) urgently. Of course, as is always the case with the definitions, such a new „totaliztic” definition of the term „science” can be expressed in a number of different wordings, all of which can still turn our attention to the urgent need of elimination of the shortcomings of „science” – as indicated above. One such possible totalizticaly „reformed” definition of „science”, could for example be expressed with the following wording:

The reformed by totalizm definition number #1 of the term „science”, developed on the basis of past experience of mankind collected along the road on which this „science” pushes itself and the entire mankind:

„Science” is an exploiting institution which lives from taxes of citizens, whose actual purpose is to meet its own needs by forcing onto the people, and later jealous guarding, of its absolute „monopoly” for the knowledge and for shaping human views, and which as a tool to achieve its selfish goal uses, amongst others: (1) its own (not subjected to independent and external verification, and thus inherently false) claim that it supposedly learned and disseminates the „truth” about the universe around us; (2) only the accepted by itself philosophical foundations and doctrines about which it has already found-out that they best serve towards its selfish goals (instead of serving for the whole of humanity) – such as „atheism”, „Occam’s razor”, the elimination from research the impact that „morality” has on the course of events in our world, etc.; (3) the approach to research of its own choice, that confirms in the easiest way the supposed correctness of its claims – e.g. the approach called „a posteriori” (instead of any different approach, e.g. „a priori”); (4) the developed by itself traditions, culture, methods of operation, etc., which turn to be most favourable to its own interests – such as „peer reviews” (by its own representatives) of all academic publications, the forcing of promoters to supervise work of young academics, the elimination of the research-topics that would lead to the discovery of truths that turn out to be dangerous to its interests (for example, the truth about the existence of God, the truth about simulation of UFOs by God, the truth about the possibility of „fabrication” by God of geological layers and e.g. „bones of dinosaurs”, that accelerate the activeness of the humanity in the „pursue of knowledge” – as described in the example from item #H2 of the web page named „god_exists.htm”, etc.), the disclosure of only that portion of the reality that surrounds us, which seems to confirm its own claims, ignoring or purposely overlooking these facts and theories already being developed (e.g. the so-called „Concept of Dipolar Gravity”) that turn out to be contradictory to its claims; etc.; etc.

In the above definition have either been named directly (and thus indicated for elimination) these imperfections of the „official definition” of science which were previously listed, or these imperfections are to be revealed indirectly – as a consequence of work of this definition.

Primitivism and the inadequacy of the current „official” definition of the term „science” is the direct cause and the reason for a multitude of disasters that recently plague the mankind. After all, by lying to the mankind, the science actually directs people astray and into an abyss. To indicate here the mechanism by which the incorrect definition of the term „science” causes the currently occurring downfall of the mankind, it suffices to explain that this official and monopolistic „science” disseminates amongst the people cardinally wrong the so-called „scientific morality” described, among others, in items #B2 and #B6 from the web page named „morals.htm”. In turn for practicing this wrong „scientific morality” God severely punishes today’s communities with cataclysms – as it is explained e.g. in item #I5 or item #I3 from the web page named „petone.htm”.

Developing a reformed definition (No. #1) for the term „science” – i.e. the one cited above, opens now the possibility to formulate a range of specific definitions for various „sciences”. The first of these definitions, a reformed version of which is needed the most urgently at present, is the definition of official human science to-date, which for the valid reasons a lot of people calls already the „old atheistic orthodox science” (after all, this science is actually „old” – because it lived for thousands of years, it is also the „atheistic” and „orthodox”). Here is the reformed by the new „totaliztic science” definition of that old science:

Totaliztic definition No. #2 for the old official „atheistic orthodox science” (i.e. the old scientific institution, which still dictates what we should learn in schools and at universities, and which retains an absolute „monopoly” for shaping our views):
The old „atheistic orthodox science” is an exploiting institution living from taxes of citizens, the actual goal of which is to meet its own needs due to the success it has achieved in forcing onto the people and then jealously guarding of its absolute „monopoly” for the knowledge and for shaping the views of people, which as tools for achieving its selfish goals uses, amongst others: (1) its own (not subjected to independent and external verification) claim that it supposedly learned and disseminates the „truth” about the universe around us; (2) only accepted by itself the philosophical foundations and doctrines which have already convinced it that they best serve towards its selfish goals (instead of serving for the good of whole humanity) – i.e. such as „atheism”, „Occam’s razor”, elimination of the research on impact of morality onto the course of events in our world, etc.; (3) the selected by itself approach to research, which in an easiest way confirms the correctness of the claims it makes – i.e. „a posteriori” approach (instead of any other approach, e.g. „a priori”); (4) the developed by itself traditions, culture, methods of operation, etc., which turn out to be the best for its own interests – of the kind of „peer reviews” of all academic papers by its representatives, the forcing of promoters to young academics, the elimination of the research-topics that would lead to the discovery of truths that turn out to be dangerous to its own interests (e.g. truths such as about the existence of God, about simulation of UFOs by God, about the possibility of „fabrication” by God of geological layers and e.g. „bones of dinosaurs”, which accelerate the activeness of the humanity in the „pursue of knowledge” – as described e.g. in item #H2 from the web page named „god_exists.htm”, etc.), the disclose of only that portion of the reality surrounding people, which seems to confirm its claims, the ignoring of facts and theories already being developed (e.g. the so-called „Concept of Dipolar Gravity”) that appear to be contradictory to its statements; etc., etc.

An absolute „monopoly for knowledge and for the shaping of human views” that holds and jealously guards this old „atheistic orthodox science”, is the original source of practically almost all the evil and suffering that we see on Earth today. Therefore, the overthrow of that monopoly is becoming nowadays one of the most urgent tasks for the entire mankind. However, in order that monopoly could be overthrown, we must first define exactly the new „totaliztic science” which has all the features that are necessary to successfully refute the monopoly of that old science.

Both reformed definitions of „science”, i.e. the definition number #1 for the term „science” (provided above) and also the definition number #2 for the term „old atheistic orthodox science” (provided above as well), allow us now to define precisely what is meant by the term „new totaliztic science”. Here is the definition of the new „totaliztic science” developed by this new science itself. (Notice, however, that this definition describes the new „totaliztic science” in its present state and situation. So if one day actually the new „totaliztic science” will be officially transformed into an institution which also lives from taxes of citizens, then this definition will require updating.)

The totaliztic definition number #3 for the new (and still eventuating) „totaliztic science”, self-developed by this new science:

The name „new totaliztic science” has been assigned to a set of science-creating tools, means to a set of ideas, scientific and philosophical foundations, objectives, principles, methods of conduct, etc. (such as „theory of everything” called the „Concept of Dipolar Gravity”, the philosophy called „totalizm”, the philosophical approach to research called „a priori” – means „from cause to effects” or „from God understood as a superior cause of everything to the surrounding reality which represents the effects of the actions of this God”, the formal proof for the existence of God, the rules of conduct which require that to the description of each fact and object is included an answer to questions of the type „how”, „why”, „what is the evidence which confirms this”, and still several further ones), which science-creating tools are almost exactly opposite to those practiced by the old „atheistic orthodox science”, and thus which (if they are implemented in the officially established scientific institution) will supply the moral strength, philosophical foundations, scientific and theoretical basis, and motivations, to overthrow the existing „monopoly for knowledge and for the shaping of human views” held so-far by that old „atheistic orthodox science”, and thus will unleash natural mechanisms of „competition” that facilitate fast human progress along the path of truth.

At this point it should also be emphasized that the reason and goal for which humanity should urgently establish and fund officially a new „totaliztic science”, is the overthrow of the monopoly of the old science and the replacement of this monopoly with the dynamic state of equilibrium and mutual interaction between these two sciences (or mere strictly – the reciprocal „looking the competition at its hands” and the validation of whatever this competition is trying to „feed” to the humanity). In turn only the existence of such a dynamic equilibrium and mutual competition is to eliminate the corruption, errors, distortions, lies, etc., with which will overgrow every science that works on principles of „monopoly”. Therefore, in the vital interest of the truth (and thus also the entire humanity) is that the new „totaliztic science” was established „in addition” to the old science, and also that through the establishment of the new „totaliztic science”, or as a result of the current struggle for the establishment of it, this old „atheistic orthodox science” was NOT accidentally destroyed (as that old science already destroyed the institutions of „religions”). This is because after such a destruction, the new science soon would become a „monopolistic institution” and would start again overgrowing with various destructive defects which are characteristic to all „monopolies”.

Of course, regardless of the performing towards the old „atheistic orthodox science” the function of „competition” – so immensely needed by the humanity, such an official establishing of the new „totaliztic science” would perform also a number of additional functions, the potential and opportunities of which in the present times we are not even able to imagine. For example, it would complement the knowledge of our civilization by that missing „second half” of knowledge, the existence of which the to-date research of our reality from „a posteriori” approach simply is unable to notice. In these people who are ready to accept God, this new science would allow to replace the „belief in God” with the „knowledge of God”. After all, it is known that religions at most are able to offer to people the „belief in God”. But the new „science” is able to offer the reliable knowledge, confidence, verifiable evidence, explanations of „why”, „how”, „since”, etc. Moreover, it is also known that one can always stop „believing”, however, one NEVER ceases to „know”. It is also worth noting that the success of a situation of „competition” in the taming of errors, distortions, corruption, etc., in the institution of science, would inspire the humanity to seek similar solutions based on „competition” in a number of other areas susceptible to corruption, distortions, errors, etc. – for example, in the area of governance of country, in local governments, in the administration of businesses, in the institution of marriage, etc. (for details see e.g. the entire web page named „humanity.htm” and item #J2.2.2 on the web page named „morals.htm”). Furthermore, when the new „totaliztic science” is officially established, it will make sure that it builds and puts into service for the humanity, NOT only my Magnocraft and my Oscillatory Chamber, but also my Time Vehicle – thus opening for people almost unlimited prospects. (After all, as this is clearly visible from the to-date course of events, the corruption and faults of the old „atheistic orthodox science” cause, that this old science will never be able to undertake the completion of my devices.)

It is also worth adding here, that in spite of its existence for over 37 years, i.e. since 1985 – when the ground-breaking for eventuation of the „totaliztic science” theory of everything called the „Concept of Dipolar Gravity” was created, until August 2012 – when the author this post formulated and published this post (item), and maybe even until today, the whole new „totaliztic science” still consisted of only one scientist who privately and at his own expense carried out all research completed by this science, i.e. consisted (and possibly may consist until now) only the author of this post – whose autobiography the reader is able to find in the web page named „pajak_jan_uk.htm”. The necessity to sustain the existence and operation of the whole new „totaliztic science” through the effort and skills of only one scientist for so long, reveals how widespread and deep is the terror sown in the society by the vengeful institution of old „atheistic orthodox science”, and how much other scientists are afraid to speak on the side of truth and morality for the fear of harassments, bullying, removals from work, accusations of mental illnesses, etc., that await everyone who for the good of all people dare to do today what is actually required from him by his conscience, knowledge, and the sense of responsibility.

* * *

The above post, which re-defines (reforms) the term „science” on basis of the to-date (painful) experiences of the humanity about behaviours of this monopolistic and exploiting institution, is an adaptation of items #C2 to #C4 from the totaliztic web page named „telekinetics.htm” (in the English language) – updated on 25 August 2012, or later. Thus, reading of the above descriptions would be even more effective from that web page, than from this post – after all e.g. on the totaliztic web pages are working all (green) links to other related web pages with additional explanations, texts are printed in colours, the content is supported with illustrations, the content is updated regularly, etc. The most recent update of the web page „telekinetics.htm” can be viewed, amongst others, at addresses:
http://soul.frihost.org/telekinetics.htm or alias: http://naj.zs.pl – which always links to the most recently updated amongst totaliztic web pages)

Notice that every address with totaliztic web pages, including the above web sites, should contain all totaliztic web pages – including web pages indicated in this post. Thus, in order to see any totaliztic web page that interests us, it suffices that in one amongst the above addresses the web page name „telekinetics.htm” is changed into the name of page which the reader wishes to see. For example, in order to see the web page named „tornado.htm” e.g. from the totaliztic web site with the address http://energia.sl.pl/telekinetics.htm , it is enough that instead of this address in the window of an internet explorer the reader writes e.g. the address http://energia.sl.pl/tornado.htm .

Also notice that a complete list of (and links to) totaliztic topics discussed in various internet forums is provided in item #E2 of the web page named „faq.htm” – also available at every address listed above.

It is worth to know as well, that almost each new topic that I am researching with „a priori” approach of the new „totaliztic science”, including this one, is repeated in all mirror blogs of totalizm still in existence (the above topic is repeated in there as the post number #223E). In past there were 5 such blogs. At the moment only two other blogs of totalizm still remain undeleted by adversaries of the new „totaliztic science” and the moral philosophy of totalizm. These can be viewed at following internet addresses:
https://totalizm.wordpress.com (or alias: http://blog.zs.pl )

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak



Komentarzy 5 to “#223E: The reason for corruption, inefficiency, errors and distortions of today’s official „science” is a deliberately erroneous definition of the term „science” that this ancient atheistic institution disseminates among the people (in English – po polsku ponizej)”

  1. Leonida Says:

    Greetings from Los angeles! I’m bored at work so I decided to check out your
    blog on my iphone during lunch break. I enjoy the information you present here and
    can’t wait to take a look when I get home. I’m surprised at how fast your blog loaded on my mobile ..
    I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, excellent blog!

  2. http://Www.busanhaps.com/ Says:

    Hello, Neat post. There is a problem together with your web site in internet explorer, would check this?
    IE nonetheless is the marketplace chief and a large element of people
    will leave out your excellent writing because of this problem.

  3. Findlegaladvocates Says:

    Everything is very open with a really clear clarification of the challenges.
    It was really informative. Your site is very useful.
    Many thanks for sharing!

  4. kantor konsultan pajak Says:

    Awesome blog! Is your theme custom made or did you download it from
    somewhere? A design like yours with a few
    simple adjustements would really make my blog
    shine. Please let me know where you got your theme. Thanks a lot

  5. Josefa Says:

    I’m amazed, I have to admit. Seldom do I come across a blog
    that’s both educative and entertaining, and without a doubt, you have hit the nail on the head.

    The issue is something which not enough folks are speaking intelligently
    about. I am very happy I stumbled across this during my search for
    something concerning this.

Możliwość komentowania jest wyłączona.

%d blogerów lubi to: