#218E: We have evidence, that God terminates lives of these people who ignore their conscience, and that the Darwin’s principle of the „survival of fittest” is just a „smoke screen” that hides the actually working God’s principle of the „survival of most moral” (in English – po polsku ponizej)

Motto: „Spare rod and probably you will cause the premature death of your child.”

Only in 2012 the new „totaliztic science” discovered, that in the world created and wisely governed by highly intelligent God, the life of intelligent beings (i.e. the so-called „intellects”) is ruled by the extremely right, justly and far-sighted principle of the „survival of most moral”. This principle could not be discovered earlier by the old „atheistic orthodox science”. After all, it is excellently hidden from that old orthodox science by the „smoke screen” in the form of the Darwin’s principle of the „survival of fittest” disseminated throughout the world by that old science. (However, on the Earth this Darwin’s principle of the „survival of fittest” is ruling only over the deprived of conscience wild animals, while over all creatures this principle would rule only in the world which has NO God – for more details on this subject see item #B1 from the web page named „changelings.htm”.)

This newly discovered principle of the „survival of most moral” is already confirmed by ever increasing body of empirical evidence that is gradually identified and researched by the new „totaliztic science” – which investigates it from „a priori” approach to research that is exactly opposite to the official stand of old science. The surprising for almost everyone example of this evidence, is the finding of the new „totaliztic science”, that „if any child is NOT justly disciplined with a proverbial ‚rod’ – as God commands to us to do in the Bible that He authorised (inspired), then with a significant probability this child is deprived the chance to live until a mature age”. (On this post, and also on the web page „will.htm”, the proverbial „rod” is used as a brief name to all kinds of „justly served corporal punishments”.)

A part of the vast body of evidence, which confirms the actual work in real life of the regularity described by the abovementioned finding, is already presented in item #D3 of the web page named „god_exists.htm”. Other part of this evidence I am presenting in item #G4 of the web page named „will.htm” (see addresses below). It is worth to review this evidence, as it confirms illustratively, that children which do NOT experience the disciplining with proverbial „rods”, do NOT develop in themselves the „cause-effect link” between the voice of their conscience, and punishments (as well as rewards) served to them by mechanisms of real life. In turn without an automatic awareness of the existence and work of this „cause-effect link”, such children do NOT learn to consult everything that they do with the voice of their conscience. In the result, as time elapses they become deaf to the voice of their conscience. On the other hand, to maintain on the Earth that principle of the „survival of most moral”, and also for other vital reasons which I am describing in item #G2 from the web page „will.htm”, God is forced to terminate (highly carefully) the lives of almost all „intellects” which become deaf to the voice of their conscience. As the result, by sparing the rod for justly punishment of children, in fact these children are exposed to a significant possibility, that they are to die still at young age, and will NOT live until their own, and that of their parents, old age.

For all above reasons, I recommend to read exactly arguments and evidence which I am presenting here, then to decide on your own what you are going to do about this matter. After all, the ignorance is NOT able to protect anyone’s children from meeting the fate of many other young people, who must die prematurely, because their parents (and also teachers and the entire society) failed to train in them the skills of listening to the voice of their conscience.

The problem of premature deaths of youngsters which have NOT acquired the habit to consult their actions with the voice of conscience, I identified only in 2012. At beginning of that year I undertook analysis of moral factors that decide about someone’s premature death in relatively young age. For the purpose of that analysis, I prepared a list of such people whom I knew in person (very well) from times of my own youth, and about which I know that all of them died at a relatively young age. It happens that my turbulent fate familiarised me with many such persons. After preparing that list, it turned out that all these people had a number of attributes in common. The most vital out of these attributes was the fact, that with their behaviours – which I perfectly well remembered from years of my youth, they always kept proving that they never listened to the voice of their conscience (other their common attributes are described in item #D3 from the web page named „god_exists.htm”). For example, one amongst them, with which I attended a school, one day dropped onto an idea, that it would be a lot of fun if he empties the entire ink from his fountain pen to the pocket of a new, elegant, snow-white jacket of our female teacher. Because he carried out this emptying of the fountain pen rapidly, without a previous announcement and without consulting it with us, in the middle of a class when the teacher walked along his sit, I had NO possibility to stop him or to convince him to abandon this „joke”. But I felt so upset by this, that until today I consider the entire event to be one amongst worse memories from that school. As a son of poor parents I understood jolly well how much sacrifices and money-savings the teacher needed at that time, in order to buy such elegant and fashionable jacket. This particular female teacher was very poor, and always looked scruffy because she could NOT afford nice clothing. Then on my own eyes I saw how beautiful and elegant she looked in this jacket. But my colleague spoiled her jacket already in the first day after she wore it (never again I saw her in that jacket – probably she was forced to throw it out). Similar behaviours which prove the lack of consultations of actions with voice of own conscience I noted in all persons known to me, which later died at a young age. This in turn allowed me to deduce in analyses at the beginning of 2012, that these young people who become deaf to the voice of their conscience, and who in addition fulfilled some additional criteria (e.g. learned to be very liked, and thus potentially could exert an immoral influence onto many other people), God simply eliminates from life by either making them killed at relatively young age, or by making them e.g. disabled.

Of course, while explaining here, that God terminates lives at young age for almost all people who developed in themselves the deafness to the voice of their conscience, I am NOT claiming, that for this purpose God appears to them in clouds and hits them with lightning after previous informing them with a thunderous voice, that this is for their deafness to the voice of conscience. Rather opposite, typically they die in such a manner, that neither themselves, nor people from their surroundings, have any idea why and for what such a death affected them. After all, to their deaths also applies the principle of God’s behaviour described in item #C2 from the web page named „tornado.htm” (also briefly indicated in item #C2 from the web page named „will.htm”), which states, that ‘in order to NOT deprive people of their „free will”, everything that God does He always does it in such a way that it contains in itself a parallel evidence that indicates at least 3 independent causes for which it has happened’. In other words, the kind of death which gets these people, is an excellent reflection of unlimited inventiveness and goal-orientation of God’s actions. Thus, they die either for one amongst many different forms of suicide (as described in item #D3 from the web page named „god_exists.htm”), or on one amongst numerously different kinds of accidents, or on some deadly illness, or in some cataclysm, or during a war, shootout, etc., etc. But no matter of what kinds of deaths get these people, they always are highly educational for other people and always give a lot of food for thoughts to everyone who learns details of their fate.

Amongst a wealth of empirical evidence which I already identified in confirmation of my conclusion (see item #G4 on the web page named „will.htm”), the most food for thought gave me „epidemic” proportions to which the problem of premature deaths of youngsters grew recently in New Zealand. The point is, that for many years in this previously relatively rich New Zealand, works a legal ban for disciplining children and teenagers with a proverbial „rod”. (This ban is partially explained already in item #B5.1 from the web page named „will.htm”.) In addition, a significant proportion of people from that country unofficially practices atheism. What even worse, New Zealand is currently ruled by women. These are women who represent a true „power behind the throne” and real „invisible rulers” that control men which pretend that they rule over the country. These also are women who alone make almost all decisions regarding upbringing of children and teenagers – thus introducing many detrimental consequences in the light of the level of imperfection of women described in item #B2 from the web page named „antichrist.htm”. In turn, all these factors taken together, create almost ideal conditions for developing by a significant proportion of the New Zealand youths a deafness to the voice of their conscience. Therefore next analyses which I carried out in my research of that problem, was the checking whether there is a cause-effect link between the ban on disciplining children and teenagers with „rods” by their parents, and the number of suicides and premature deaths (as well as mental illnesses) amongst these undisciplined youngsters. In these analyses my attention was attracted to several facts which I noted previously. One amongst them was my own memory of times in young age, when I myself was justly disciplined with a rod. My youth happen still in times, when parents justly disciplined their children with a proverbial „rods” (i.e. when parents still used „corporal punishment”), as well as some older (from before the war) teachers in schools also still used various versions of justly punishments with rods. From that time I remember very well, that myself never was upset at anyone, when I was getting a justly disciplining with a rod for some wrongdoing. However, I felt extremely anguished if I did something wrong, but an appropriate punishment was NOT served to me. Explaining this in other words, on the basis of my own experiences I know, that children do NOT object a justly being disciplined with rods (although they do NOT like being disciplined). But their mentality is significantly disturbed by the lack of such disciplining when their conscience is telling them that they deserve a punishment. (This mental disturbance of the children’s psychology by the lack of punishment, explains why in the country in which punishing with rods is banned, so many children suffer mental illnesses.) We must remember, that small children from the very beginning listen to their voice of conscience – as this is excellently revealed by research described for example in the article [1#G1] entitled „Sense of right and wrong in place by six months of age, researchers found”, from page A5 of newspaper „The New Zealand Herald”, issue dated on Tuesday, May 11, 2010. (In a similar manner domesticated animals act. Contrary to wild animals, wise God also equipped them into the organ of conscience – thus the presence of conscience differentiates domesticated animals from wild animals. For example, my cat „Teecee” spectacularly illustrated its feeling of guilt always when he did something immoral – e.g. when he stole food from a cat of neighbour.) Only in the school age or in high-school some amongst these children learn how to ignore or stifle the voice of conscience in themselves. A second highly helpful experience was an old folklore belief that I knew, that children act and behave like animals – and thus in order to teach them anything, one needs to „train” them (similarly like one trains animals). After all, the „training” of animals depends just on development in them the cause-effect link between some signal, and whatever is required from them. Both these experiences taken together, realised to me that disciplining children with a rod actually depends on developing in them an awareness of a direct cause-effect link between whatever their voice of conscience tells to them, and whatever happens to them in the real life. Thus, if someone fails to discipline his or her children with a rod, then with the elapse of time these children learn to become deaf to the voice of their conscience. After all, they do NOT see a need to listen to this voice, if the conscience tells them one thing, while their parents and the life that they lead state something completely different. Unfortunately to these children, apart from their parents exists also God – for Whom people deaf to the voice of their conscience become useless. After all, the conscience is that only organ in people, which fulfils the function of a direct „hot line” which links minds of these people with the mind of God. It is with the use of this „hot line” that God communicates with such people, tells them what they should do and what they should NOT do, inspires their searches, etc. – as all these functions of conscience are explained in detail by subsections JA10, JA1.1, and I5.3 from volumes 6 and 5 of my newest monograph [1/5]. Therefore if God detects such a useless person which already at young age learned to be deaf to the voice of its conscience, then God finds some most appropriate manner to terminate the life of it (with a lesson to other people).

For various reasons (e.g. political) Christian religion tells us, that the major occupation of God is to „forgive us our sins”. Thus, it may become a large shock for someone to learn, that e.g. God brings also killing cataclysms, amongst others, to people who practice the highly immoral philosophy of parasitism – as this is explained on the web page named „quake.htm”, or to realise that God eliminates (kills) these intellects (persons) which become deaf to the voice of their conscience. Therefore it is desirable to realise also at this point, that similarly like everything that God does, such killing is „fair” and highly justly. After all, God does NOT rush with terminating someone’s life, but always gives to a given person a lot of time and warnings to change his or her ways. Not without reasons an old Polish proverb states „God slow, but justly” (in the original Polish language: „Bóg nierychliwy, ale sprawiedliwy” – notice that this proverb has its equivalents in almost every language of the world, e.g. in English its equivalent states that „though the mills of God grind slowly, they grind exceedingly small”.) Furthermore, before God undertakes such a drastic action, He always firstly makes sure with the aid of appropriately designed moral tests and exams, that really a given intellect completely ceased to listen to the voice of its conscience, and that this particular case is already hopeless. God gives also to every such intellect a number of warnings to change its ways, and only at very end He terminates its life – if these warnings do NOT bring any effect. For example, in the Bible that He authorised (inspired), God in many places emphasizes and commands to us, that we should discipline our children with a rod – for details see item #B5.1 from the web page named „will.htm”. So if someone stubbornly refuses to listen to these commands of God and decides to NOT discipline own children with the proverbial rod, then he or she accepts a full responsibility for a possible premature death of own child. Also, in many parts of the Bible God clearly warns, that He is going to kill these people who do NOT listen to the voice of own conscience (thus that He will terminate lives of some amongst the children which parents fail to discipline with a rod to teach them listening to the voice of their conscience). Only that the Bible was written around 2000 years ago – when the humanity had NO yet as clear and unambiguous vocabulary as today. So in order to understand these God’s warnings, we firstly need to analyse them thoroughly and to translate them into a present language. So let us do this together (the reader and myself) on two examples. In the Biblical „Book of Ezekiel”, verse 33:18, God states, quote: „When a righteous man stops doing good and starts doing evil, he will die for it.” Although that verse does NOT use a word „conscience”, the word „righteous” perfectly replaces it. After all, in order someone is „righteous” this someone must listen to the voice of his „conscience”. Other example which, this time more diplomatically, states exactly the same, is provided in the inter-testamental book „Ecclesiasticus, or the Wisdom of Sirach” from the Bible (do not confuse it with the Biblical book „Koheleth or Ecclesiastes”), verse 30:1, quote: „A man who loves his son will beat him frequently so that in after years the son may be his comfort” (this is NOT the exact translation of this verse, but it is the best translation which I managed to find, as English Bibles reluctantly publish this particular book). Because of many-centuries-long telling us by Church, that „God forgives our sins”, most people would understand this verse as if in the present precise language it would state something along the line that „if you love your son, then you better discipline him frequently with a rod, so that he grows up into a decent man which is going to respect you and support you at your old age – because undisciplined children grew up into baddies who with an elapse of time become only a trouble to their parents”. However, in fact this verse should be understood as a diplomatic and multilevel warning of God, stating that „if you love your son, then with a rod teach him to listen to the voice of his conscience, because otherwise I will terminate his life and at your old age you will have NO son to comfort you”.

* * *

How to overcome obstacles and dilemmas and begin to defend yourself and your loved ones from sharing the fate of such intellects deaf to the voice of their conscience?

Motto: „Totalizm always helps.”

The general principle of defence from premature death caused by the deafness to the voice of own conscience is simple. Namely, in everything that we do we should consult our actions with the voice of our conscience. But in practice this defence is quite difficult for many reasons. For example, because „doing of what is moral must be difficult, otherwise lying on our back and doing nothing would be the most moral behaviour in the entire world” – as explains it more thoroughly item #E3 on the web page named „god_exists.htm”. In turn listening to our voice of conscience and carrying out whatever this conscience tells us to do, is a highly moral behaviour. Therefore in the world governed by God it must be difficult, and truly it is so. After all, if for example we are a father and a head of family, then the justly punishing our child with a rod gives to us a characteristics similar to that of a dentist – when we need to be painful in order to be a good parent in the final count. Thus, if the conscience commands to us that we should justly punish our child with a proverbial „rod”, because this child just did something very wrong, then immediately we encounter a whole array of factors which make this difficult for us. The first amongst these probably will be our wife, which – as all women (i.e. beings created by God with a high level of imperfection – as this is explained in item #B2 from the web page named „antichrist.htm”) will probably make this impossible for us. Then – if by any chance we live in a country which established anti-parental laws (such as these prevailing in New Zealand and which are described in item #B5.1 from the web page named „will.htm”) we must risk a prison because of the use of a rod while the law forbids this. Furthermore, on our way are to stand also our own feelings – how to use a „rod” on a child which we love a lot. Another obstacle will be this child – which after being disciplined will run to the street and complain to everyone that „the father bit me – thus I hate him, because he is much worse than mum and he does NOT love me”. Etc., etc. Therefore, such fathers who decide to discipline their children with a proverbial „rod”, are forced to overcome all these obstacles (Also every wise and thoughtful mum – i.e. a mother deprived typical female imperfections, is forced to overcome similar obstacles, when e.g. temporally her husband is absent, and thus she is forced to serve the justice to her child on her own.) In addition, fathers must also learn to use a rod „justly”. Means the punishment which they serve must be proportional to the guilt. It also cannot cause in a child any physical damage to the body. Furthermore, it should be proceeded with a verbal explanation why it is served, how much it amounts to (for a given kind of misbehaviour), and how in the future this child should behave in order to NOT deserve it anymore. Psychologically a highly helpful is also establishing for the use of a child a form of mutually accepted „pardoning” or „asylum” – i.e. the creation of some difficult to accomplish by a child, and known both, to this child and to parents, manner of avoiding a punishment (but this manner must fulfil a number of important conditions – e.g. must work almost instantly, because serving a punishment must not be postponed, it cannot depend on doing of some routinely chore, because a child with the elapse of time develops an „allergy” to this particular chore, etc.) In other words, everything that concerns such a punishment must be agreeable with moral recommendations of the philosophy of totalizm described in volumes 6 and 7 of my newest monograph [1/5].

Of course, children and teenagers also can by themselves work on developing their sensitivity to the voice of own conscience. After all, wise God for children make such self-learning of the obedience to the voice of conscience much easier than teaching it by adults. Children from the very beginning have this skill – as this is explained by the article [1#G1] from the beginning of this post. Later they only need to make sure that they do NOT loose it e.g. because of a bad influence of their peers, teachers, mass media, politicians, authorities, etc. But in order children and teenagers undertake their own efforts in such a right direction, someone amongst adults must explain to them exactly on examples which are illustrative and acting onto their imagination, „why” this should be done in their lives. In other words, someone amongst adults must firstly explain to them what is written in entire „part #G” of the web page named „will.htm” – only that beforehand he or she must translate this onto the language which children are able to understand.

The above is worth to complement with an information, that these people who in an aware manner begin to listen and obey their organ of conscience, automatically become „totalizts”. This is because practicing the most basic version of the philosophy of totalizm, i.e. the version called „intuitive totalizm”, boils down just to listening and to obeying the voice of our conscience.

* * *

The above post documents that „people who do NOT listen to the voice of their conscience typically must die prematurely”. Thus, it also explains that „parents who fail to discipline their children with a proverbial ‚rod’, and thus who do NOT develop in their children skills of listening to the voice of conscience, risk that their children die at young age” – because these children may get killed as a result of implementing the God’s principle of the „survival of most moral”. The post is an adaptation of items #G1 to #G7 from the totaliztic web page named „will.htm” (update from 7th May 2012, or later). Thus, reading the above descriptions would be even more effective from that web page than from this post – as in the totaliztic web pages are working all (green) links to other related web pages with additional explanations, text includes colours, presentations are supported with illustrations, the content is updated regularly, etc. The latest update of the web page „will.htm” can be viewed, amongst others, at addresses:
http://magnocraft.horizon-host.com/will.htm  or alias: http://naj.zs.pl (which always links to the most important amongst recent updates of totaliztic web pages)

Notice that every address with totaliztic web pages, including the above web sites, should contain all totaliztic web pages – including web pages indicated in this post. Thus, in order to see any other totaliztic web page that interests us, it suffices that in one amongst the above addresses the web page name „will.htm” is changed to the name of page which the reader wishes to see. For example, in order to see the web page named „petone.htm” e.g. from the totaliztic web site with the address http://energia.sl.pl/will.htm , it is enough that instead of this address, in the window of an internet explorer the reader writes the address http://energia.sl.pl/petone.htm .

It is also worth to know, that almost each new topic that I am researching with „a priori” approach of the new „totaliztic science”, including this one, is repeated in all mirror blogs of totalizm still in existence (the above topic is repeated in there as the post number #218E). In past there were 5 such blogs. At the moment only two blogs of totalizm still remain undeleted by adversaries of the new „totaliztic science” and the moral philosophy of totalizm. These can be viewed at following internet addresses:
https://totalizm.wordpress.com or alias: http://blog.zs.pl
While reviewing these blogs, it is worth to have look at their related posts, e.g. at posts number #215E, #213E and #209E – which also discuss similar topics.

With the totaliztic salute,
Jan Pajak


Jedna odpowiedź to “#218E: We have evidence, that God terminates lives of these people who ignore their conscience, and that the Darwin’s principle of the „survival of fittest” is just a „smoke screen” that hides the actually working God’s principle of the „survival of most moral” (in English – po polsku ponizej)”

  1. Alex B. Says:

    Hello! Quick question that’s completely off topic.

    Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly?

    My web site looks weird when viewing from my iphone 4.
    I’m trying to find a theme or plugin that might be able to correct this issue.
    If you have any recommendations, please share. Appreciate it!

Możliwość komentowania jest wyłączona.

%d blogerów lubi to: