Motto: „Everything that is recognised to be ‚holy’ displays various attributes which just cannot be explained on basis of atheistic science.”
A rather extraordinary class of scientific evidence for the existence of God, is the difference between attributes of substances or objects which in past were called „holy”, and attributes of other similar substances or objects which were NOT considered to be holy. For example, let us consider attributes of such „holy” substances and objects, as: (1) „daily bread” (by the Christian religion considered to be a representation of the body of Christ), (2) „coconuts”, (3) „drinking water” (by first Christians used for christening, while by pagans utilised in water dowsing), (4) „red wine” (considered to represent the blood of Jesus). If one compares their attributes with attributes of other very similar substances or objects, e.g. with attributes of: (1n) white bread or buns, (2n) fruits of tropical durian, (3n) undrinkable water, (4n) white wine, then outcomes of this comparison become very meaningful. Namely, it then turns out that everything that in past was described as „holy” actually displays attributes which are beneficial to people at many levels, and which do NOT introduce any side effects. In turn everything that was NOT considered holy shows also various attributes that are undesirable for humans – in spite that in almost every aspect it is similar to a related holy substance or object. For example, in spite that the „daily bread” and the „white bread” are baked in a similar manner and from almost the same flour, differences between their consequences for health of people are huge. Similarly, in spite that „red wine” and „white wine” are produced through the same process from almost the same grapes which grew on exactly the same soil, their influences onto drinking people are very different. In fact these differences in attributes of whatever in past (and sometimes also today) was called „holy”, from attributes of whatever is NOT considered to be holy, cannot be justify exclusively with the use of findings and knowledge of present „atheistic” science. So let us now provide here several most meaningful examples of extraordinary attributes of something that in past was considered to be „holy”. In order to shorten the discussion, below is analysed only a single attribute which does NOT appear in similar substances and objects that are NOT considered to be holy. But independently from the attribute discussed below, each substance and object mentioned below displays also a whole range of further extraordinary attributes which are very difficult to justify by present atheistic science. So here are these examples:
(1) Irreplaceable attributes of the holy „daily bread”. As we know the humanity invented a large variety of dishes which are made of flour. To such dishes belong: buns, cakes, pancakes, macaroons, dumplings, etc., etc. But only the so-called „daily bread” was considered in past to be holy. This „daily bread” used to be wholegrain bread, baked from the unsifted wholemeal rye flour. The dough for this bread was fermented before baking in a similar manner like until present time are fermented the Japanese „miso” and Korean „kimchi” (for descriptions of Korean „kim-chi” – see item #B1 from the web page „korea.htm” – about the mysterious, fascinating, moral, and progressive Korea). In the result of this fermentation, the daily bread become black like the soil from which it grew, and thus considered to be „too common” for wealthy people. Only this bread in old times was treated with the highest respect and worshiped as holy. White bread, buns, cakes, and other products made of flour, were NOT considered to be „holy”. In fact I still remember until today from Poland of the times of my childhood, means Poland of 1950s, such manifestations of the respect to „daily bread” which were still practiced then. For example, at that time people used to say sorry to, and to kiss, a slice of bread when they accidentally allowed it to fall to the floor. Old-timers never threw away to rubbish even smallest crumbs of bread. Furthermore, to express their respect to this bread, men used to take hats off their heads for the duration of eating – even in most cold days. As present people discovered this, the formerly „holy” daily bread in fact displays attributes that deserve the holiness. For example, eating this bread in any quantities does NOT bring any undesirable consequences to the human health. (On the other hand eating large amounts of any other products made from flour turns out to be unhealthy.) Furthermore, people can survive by eating exclusively this holy „daily bread”, while they cannot survive by eating exclusively any other dish made of flour.
(2) The fact that coconuts never fall on heads of people, in spite that in light of statistics there should be cases of falling coconuts hitting some people in heads. As I explained this on a separate web page „fruit.htm” – about tropical fruits from the area of Pacific, „in many tropical countries coconut palms are considered to be ‚holy trees'” which were designed especially by God to satisfy all basic needs of people. (Notice that the holiness of coconuts is recognised in there in a similar manner as in old Europe the holiness of „daily bread” was practiced.) The holiness of coconut palms proves itself because e.g. on small oceanic islands, on which is NOT growing anything else apart from this palm, in fact coconut palms are providers of everything. In some religions, e.g. Hinduism, gods receive gifts from coconuts. The Bible says that palm branches were placed in front of walking Jesus. This holiness of coconut palms is there also a source of the deep belief which prevails in countries in which coconuts grow, namely that in order to NOT harm people heavy „coconuts never fall onto heads of humans”. Actually in many tropical countries, e.g. in Malaysia, locals are saying that „coconut palms have eyes” – thus they never drop a coconut on heads of humans. I personally was very intrigued by this belief. So whenever I had an opportunity to visit an area where coconut palms grow, I always asked locals whether they know a case that a coconut fell on someone’s head. I must confirm here, that in spite of my wide and many years long asking „I never encountered a case that someone knew someone else on the head of whom a coconut fell”. Such a case would be quite well-known, because the large weight of coconuts combined with the significant height of coconut palms, would cause that the fell of a coconut on someone’s head would kill such unfortunate person. Of course, this lack of cases when coconuts fall on human heads is something extraordinary and it should be explained by the „holiness” of the palm. After all, other (non-holy) trees drop their fruits completely at random, in this on human heads. I myself remember a case when a falling apple hit me in the head – fortunately was ripe and soft. In Malaysia grows a tasty fruit which just has a size of coconuts – it is called „durian”. It is commonly known there, that at the time of durians’ ripening, people should either keep far from these trees, or wear protective „hard hats”. This is because heavy durian fruits fall „at random”, including onto human heads. So it is nothing unusual to hear over there about cases of people getting hit by durian fruits.
Regrettably, someone clearly could NOT stand this extraordinary attribute of „holy palms” and decided to include also the holy coconuts into the „scientific atheism”. Namely, that someone started to spread on the behalf of science the untrue claims that supposedly in the world every year dies from falling coconuts as much as 150 people. These claims make falling coconuts hypothetically even more dangerous than attacks of sharks. Such false claims were disseminated in so organised manner, that on their base various insurance companies started to develop their „coconut policies”. Fortunately for the truth, some scientists decided to get to the bottom of the „research” on which the coconut deaths claims were based. Outcomes of their research were summarised later, amongst others, in the article „Lies, damn lies, and 150 coconut deaths” from page B9 of the New Zealand newspaper named „Weekend Herald”, issue dated on Saturday, April 12, 2008. Searches of these scientists revealed, that the claims were made up in Australia in 2002. Only then were disseminated all over the world by an article in Daily Telegraph. At the beginning these claims referred to the publication of a Canadian professor, in which there was NO quantitative data on this subject, while the professor himself denied that he ever accumulated such quantitative data. Thus, in spite of the lies spread on this subject under a smoke screen of the official science, in fact coconuts never fall down on heads of people.
(3) The holy river Ganges in India belongs to the most biologically polluted rivers of the world. But Hindu devotes drink water directly from the river. In spite of this, Hindu who believe in holiness of this river never report an illness acquired by drinking biologically polluted water of this river.
(3) All 12 Apostles drank wine from the same cup. But the Bible does NOT report that any Apostle acquired an illness passed around due to this drinking of all of them from the same cup.
The described above documentation for the existence of extraordinary attributes (which cannot be justified nor explained on the basis of atheistic science) in all substances and objects acknowledged as „holy”, was adopted from item #F2 from the web page named „bible.htm”, update of 14 April 2008, or later. In turn descriptions and legends concerning coconuts and fruits of durian discussed above are presented in items #1 and #4 from the totaliztic web page „fruit.htm” about tropical fruits from the area of Pacific, update of 15 April 2008, or later. The web page „fruit.htm” should be available from following addresses ?if it was not sabotaged there by evil powers that recently rampage in the internet and all over the Earth (probably these evil powers are also responsible for organising the lies about 150 deaths per year from coconuts):
It is also worth to know that under each address indicated above ALL the web pages of totalizm should be available (unless some of these web pages were sabotaged in the meantime). Thus, if someone wishes to view descriptions from any other web page of totalizm, e.g. from a web page listed in this message, or listed in other totaliztic messages, then in the above addresses the name „fruit.htm” is just enough to exchange for a name of the web page that he or she wishes to view, e.g. for the name of web page „boiler.htm”, „free_energy.htm”, „wszewilki_jutra_uk.htm”, „newzealand.htm”, „free_energy.htm”, „fe_cell.htm”, „malbork_uk.htm”, „evolution.htm”, „god.htm”, „bible.htm”, „text_1_5.htm”, „dipolar_gravity.htm”, „nirvana.htm”, „evil.htm”, „memorial.htm”, etc., etc.
I should also add here that in September 2007 web sites of totalizm, as well as everything that is linked with totalizm, were subjected to a massive „anti-totaliztic” offensive. In the result of this offensive for example were deleted over 50 of free sub-domains of totalizm (almost each one of these free sub-domains contained all web pages of totalizm ?means around 200 web pages were deleted on each such sub-domain). A significant proportion of these sub-domains existed (and was utilized with a great success) since 2000 and some even from 1999. A list of web pages deleted then is provided at the end of the page „Menu 4” accessible from each web page of totalizm. Because of the fact that highly moral totalizm is so aggressively and brutally persecuted and destroyed by some hidden evil force, this message for the security of access is also repeated at several blogs of totalizm that contain a mirror copies of it, for example at blogs having following addresses:
Let totalizm prevail,